Its fun and interesting to speculate about who would be in
the Ancient History Hall of Fame if there were such a place, and I admit that building
a list like this is subjective. Fame plays a significant role here, making it
difficult to include those who are generally unknown to the public. My sense of
antiquity is that individuals whose fame has endured over the millennia were
the most important. My list omits the infamous whose misdeeds are their claim
to fame.
To invoke a baseball analogy, there are a group of ancients
that I will label first ballot hall of famers. That is individuals who would be
on everyone’s list and would never have their selection questioned. That list
includes,
Alexander the Great, Aristotle, Caesar Augustus, Cleopatra, Confucius,
Constantine the Great, Hannibal, Herodotus, Homer, Jesus, Julius Caesar, Moses,
Saul (Paul) of Tarsus, Pericles, Plato, Siddhartha Gautama, Socrates, Solon,
and Thucydides. That’s nineteen.
In the second tier I would place Aeschylus, Aristophanes, Attila the Hun, St.
Augustine, Demosthenes, Euclid, Euripides, Hammurabi, Hippocrates, Nebuchadnezzar
II, Pindar, Sappho, Scipio Africanus, Sophocles, Thales, Virgil, Xerxes, and
Zoroaster. Another eighteen.
My
third tier would contain Archimedes, Cato, Empedocles, Galen, Justinian I Mithridates
VI, Ovid, Plutarch, Ramses II, and Spartacus, making the list total 47.
Do we
add more and, if so, by what criteria? A structured approach would dictate
selection by category of accomplishment. For example, the Greeks made
significant contributions in philosophy, science, drama, and poetry, so we
should choose one or more from each of these. Right? But, trying to build a
list like this, and limiting its size, gets one into trouble quickly.
It is
generally thought that the four greatest dramatists of all time were
Shakespeare, Aristophanes, Aeschylus, and Euripides. If all three Greeks are in
a class with the Bard, shouldn’t that make them hall of famers?
Philosophy
is tougher still. You start with Plato and Aristotle and then it makes sense to
add Socrates and Thales. Who else? There are so many candidates – Zeno,
Epicurus, Anaximander, Heraclitus, etc.
There are two groups I have not selected from: those too
obscure to be eligible and those who didn’t quite make the grade for a short
list. In the first group I include Ashkoka (Indian emperor of the Maurya
Dynasty), Hashesput (fifth Pharaoh of the Eighteenth Dynasty of Egypt), Inhotep
(a Polymath circa 2650 B.C.), and Sargon the Great (Akkadian king of 2300
B.C.).
The second group contains Agrippa (important as Augustus
right hand man) but not quite good enough, Thermistocles (admiral of the
Athenian Navy), Anaximander, Anaximenes, and Tacitus.
Now let’s move on to a few more who are worthy. There
are seven in this group: Trajan, Marcus Aurelius, Livy, Leonidas, Lysander, Isocrates,
and Cicero. The Golden Age of the empire is an important period and Trajan and
Marcus are its bookends. Trajan reigned from 98-117 A.D, stabilizing the empire
and initiating a period of calm lasting 82 years. Marcus Aurelius was the last
of the dynasty and is important for his reflective personality and stoic
philosophy. It was a sad irony that Marcus hated wars and yet was fated to
fight in them for almost his entire reign.
If you have Herodotus and Thucydides on the list you have to
have Livy -- Rome’s greatest historian. We are all the poorer because so many
of his books were lost.
In my view, you can’t construct an Ancient’s Hall of Fame without
Spartans, so I have included two: Leonidas and Lysander. Leonidas is famous for
one single event, his defense at Thermopylae. That story has resonated around
the world ever since as an example of courage, honor, and devotion to the
cause. Leonidas has a unique place on the list because his contribution
occurred during a single event that cost him his life, rather than
contributions over a lifetime. Lysander was Sparta’s greatest admiral, largely
responsible for ending the Peloponnesean War in Sparta’s favor.
I thought of including Lycurgus, architect of the Spartan
political system, but we’re not sure a single person with that name existed.
I include Isocrates, at risk, because some would call him
obscure. He labored under the shadow of Plato but his contribution to the
development of educational systems that followed him is unequalled. He was
Athens’ greatest orator and had a great influence over the politics of is day.
So now we reach the end with Cicero, who as a philosopher,
orator, statesman, lawyer, and political theorist had a significant impact on late
Republican Rome. Cicero’s Latin prose was unequalled as he built a Latin
philosophical vocabulary by translating the Greek. His letters, when discovered
during the 14th century, helped launch the renaissance, through an
emerging interest in the writings of antiquity. Cicero’s humanist philosophy
influenced the renaissance, while his republicanism influenced the founders of
the United States.
We could add more women and make the list longer. Perhaps
someone will want to provide some names. We have Cleopatra and Sappho on the
list. Others, including Augustus’ wife Luvilla And Leonidas’ wife Gorgo come to
mind. Unfortunately, women didn’t receive the publicity in the ancient world
that men did and their lack of access to power and status made it much harder for
them to become famous.
Now we have a complete list of 54 – an odd number and no more
than an arbitrary stopping point based on subjective criteria. It’s too bad we
have so few Hall of Famers like them today. In this modern age, power and money
have subverted wisdom and knowledge.
4 comments:
Great Blog! Keep it coming!
Welcome back ~ so whose statue would you pull down?
[& put in a museum].
Ashoka is obscure, and Hammurabi is not?
Pretty section of content. I just stumbled upon your blog and in accession capital to assert that I get actually enjoyed account your blog posts. Any way I’ll be subscribing to your feeds and even I achievement you access consistently rapidly.national archives civil war
Post a Comment