tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-649431201703508681.post129348823916156901..comments2023-11-02T10:22:20.717-04:00Comments on Mike Anderson's Ancient History Blog: The Early Kings of RomeMike Andersonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02072553719998549925noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-649431201703508681.post-29522770202207909132013-04-17T21:05:53.216-04:002013-04-17T21:05:53.216-04:00You missed that there was a Di-archy, a Dual Monar...You missed that there was a Di-archy, a Dual Monarchy at the beginning of Rome. Another one of those parallels with Sparta. You missed Titus Tatius co-ruling with Romulus. <br /><br />Next, in order to write authoritatively on Rome's constitution, government, and law, one had to be a Roman official of some sort. Livy had none of this. W.LindsayWheelerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06236577164127792348noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-649431201703508681.post-34818886300150082002013-04-16T12:09:19.652-04:002013-04-16T12:09:19.652-04:00Wow, glad I found this blog (someone shared it on ...Wow, glad I found this blog (someone shared it on reddit). It seems to me like the meat in the history/legacy of Rome is in the late republic and then on through the Principate/Imperial eras. It's interesting to read about the old kings and the laying of the groundwork of Rome.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com